In contrast to Navarro, I argue that all possible data should be considered when evaluating a process model (i.e., not just data from novel contexts), that quantitative model selection methods provide a more principled and complete method of selecting between process models than visual assessments of qualitative trends, and that the idea of ancillary assumptions that are not part of the core explanation in the model is a slippery slope to an infinitely flexible model. Here, I provide a critique of several of Navarro’s points on these broad issues. to encourage directed exploration of new territory” (p.30), that “understanding how the qualitative patterns in the empirical data emerge naturally from a computational model of a psychological process is often more scientifically useful than presenting a quantified measure of its performance” (p.33), and that “quantitative measures of performance are essentially selecting models based on their ancillary assumptions” (p.33). Cognitive psychology investigates internal mental processes. However, using models to understand psychological processes comes with an additional challenge: how do we select the best model from a range of potential models that all aim to explain the same psychological process? A recent article by Navarro (2019 Computational Brain & Behavior) provided a detailed discussion on several broad issues within the area of model selection, with Navarro suggesting that “one of the most important functions of a scientific theory is. Reflections on the social and psychological processes of legitimization and delegitimization. Identify psychological processing deficits in children with the Childrens Psychological Processes Scale: Normative Update. Psychology is the study of the mind, how it works, and how it might affect behavior. Psychology research has become increasingly focused on creating formalized models of psychological processes, which can make exact quantitative predictions about observed data that are the result of some unknown psychological process, allowing a better understanding of how psychological processes may actually operate. The switching model explains key long- and short-term dynamicĮffects in the data.Model selection, Science, Quantitative model comparison, Cognitive models Abstract ThisĮmbodies the psychological assumption of "regime switching", with subjectsĪlternating between different cognitive states representing different modes ofĭecision-making. I introduce the term cultural retooling to capture this process and provide a theory of its psychological dynamics. Hidden Markov switching process as an explanation of time-varying effects. Using dataįrom three highly-cited experiments we find strong evidence in favor of a It contains review materials. Psychologically plausible time-varying changes in model parameters. memory and forgetting, motivation, emotion, thinking and reasoning, states of consciousness, personality and intelligence. We use particle Markov chain Monte-Carlo methods to study Static, or sacrificed some psychological content of the models for statistical ![]() Research has either ignored these changes, treating the underlying process as Performance, changing the psychological processes under investigation. ![]() ![]() The field of psychology is considered a 'Hub Science' with strong connections to the medical sciences, social sciences, and education (Boyack, Klavans, & Borner, 2005). Psychologists are actively involved in studying and understanding mental processes, brain functions, and behavior. CO2: Identify how psychologists’ study human behaviour and how this knowledge can be used to explain, predict, and influence. ![]() In such experiments, time-on-task can have sizable effects on Psychology is the scientific study of the mind and behavior. CO1: Identify how we become aware of ourselves, how we learn to interact with others, and how we influence others and how they influence us. Statistical precision required to test quantitative theories of psychological Brown Download PDF Abstract: Many psychological experiments have subjects repeat a task to gain the Hawkins, Robert Kohn, Minh-Ngoc Tran, Scott D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |